This is as good a time as any to contextualize the idea of living "waste-free." In terms of outright food waste, we were already producing very, very little of it. Cooking for two is pretty manageable, especially if you're not opposed to eating leftovers for lunches and snacks. This was not something I was raised doing -- my parents spared us from Mystery Casserole Night and other culinary horrors the likes of which are portrayed in pop culture and Audrey's therapy sessions. (J/K, Aud.) But I was raised in an environment that lauded my bottomless adolescent stomach, and since an early age I've been happy to perform in the capacity of human garbage disposal.
Every once in a while we'll let the last fifth of a container of sour cream sit for too long in the back of the fridge, or we'll go too many weeks between making patches of pasta sauce and a half a tin of tomato paste will mold. But other than that -- between lunchtime leftovers and my own unflinching dietary habits -- we mostly don't throw out food. Anything that does go bad or stale or stinky or uneaten (rare) is composted or becomes chicken feed, which is arguably not even *waste* as it becomes an additive to our next season of gardening or batch of eggs.
Yeah. Yeah! We don't waste food. Not us.
Or do we? I came across this article from Grist.Org recently on the InterWebz, and it made me realize that there is a lot more we can do to reduce even the amount of food "uneatenness" we produce. Audrey already follows some of the basic suggestions -- she makes generous use of broccoli stems when she makes her famous broc-cheddar soup -- but there's definitely room for improvement. We often talk about making vegetarian broth/stock out of inedible leftovers yet those scraps seem to always find their way into the compost jar. The article also shares some more extreme techniques such as "milking" sugary syrup from kernel-denuded corn cobs. Cool! Definitely some room for improvement there.
Here's a quick bullet-list of our definition of waste for the purposes of this project:
Waste is...
- kitchen waste only (i.e. we're still using TP, floss, and other hygenic goodies with impunity)
- recyclables, but not return-ables (i.e. a cardboard milk carton isn't allowed, but a glass bottle of Strauss milk that we return to the Co-Op is okay [yes, the plastic top to the Strauss bottle is a no-no])
- packaging, but not bulk or "unavoidable" packaging -- a disposable bag/box of rice is obviously not allowed, but we do know that even the rice we buy in bulk from the Co-Op originally came out of a 25-pound paper bag or plastic sack. This is the minimal amount of packaging we can "stimulate" without harvesting our rice directly from the paddy
- not basic, basic materials -- we can reduce a lot of packaging waste by making our own bread and buying fresh bread rather than the standard sliced-bread-in-a-bag. But the yeast has to come from somewhere, so we're giving ourselves a pass on über-basics like yeast, baking soda, etc
- not uneaten food, because we compost it, but we should (and do) generally avoid this
- not Freegan food -- if we glean a cardboard case of individually wrapped granola bars, we get to eat them in all their nutritious glory. Think about it -- the bars were on their way to a landfill already. I swooped in and grabbed them, ate the majority of their bulk/weight, and recycled the foil wrappers and cardboard box. It's actually a net reduction in waste, which I would argue gives us some wiggle room on the overall project
- not the small stuff -- try as we might, it's hard to avoid the stickers that come on produce, the twisty-ties that bind bunches of cilantro, etc. But don't we get some credit for going Freegan in some ways? Also, compare the amount of waste you'd produce in a year buying hyper-packaged Trader Joe's produce to the trash you'd create in twelve months living off Co-Op and farmers' market produce. After all, 98 percent is just as much an A-grade as 100 percent, right?
Some other thoughts on waste...
Check out this video (courtesy of MB) that focuses on a family that has taken waste-free living to another level. Interestingly, the video's opening concession (yes, the family does produce some waste) reveals what appears to be random candy wrappers and maybe string cheese wrappers. (Rather than, for instance, produce stickers.) We used some of this family's techniques in preparing for (and executing) our own experiment.
What about recycling? One could argue that only waste ends up in a garbage can is truly waste; by corollary, anything composted, recycled, donated, or reused is not waste. I'm sympathetic to the claim, but we also have to look all the way up- and down-stream before we pass judgment.
- If you accept a plastic grocery bag at the store and then "reuse" it by filling it with pet waste and throw it in the garbage, you've really just turned a stinky organic mess into a stinky organic mess wrapped in an inorganic, possibly toxic sack that will break down into thousands of tiny flakes over time.
- If you "donate" your 32" CRT television set to a thrift store that doesn't want it or can't sell it and which then turns around and sticks it in a shipping container bound for Ghana where it will be smashed into bits by child workers poisoned by its toxic innards, you haven't done Mother Earth any favors.
- If you buy lots of over-packaged food and then place the plastic boxes and wrappers in your municipal recycling bin, you may or may not be helping. Does Waste Management or Allied Waste actually "recycle" that stuff, or do they send it to the landfill whenever the prevailing market price for the material isn't high enough?
- Even if it is recycled, what are the up- and down-stream effects of that process? In this country, we recycle glass by melting it down and re-forming it into new glass containers. (Everywhere else in the world, they recognize that you don't get cooties from sanitizing a beer bottle and reusing it. They also use the Metric System. Go figure.) Glass recycling in the U.S. is extremely energy-intensive (say, compared to aluminum recycling), and the recycling of plastics can create byproducts and additional wastes. So we are stuck trying to measure the trade-offs between various important goals (reducing landfill waste, protecting the planet, using resources effectively, etc). The best option seems to be avoiding the packaging in the first place.
- And yes, composting is great but as we pointed out above it would be better to harvest every possible calorie or flavor molecule out of our food before setting it out to rot.
(Quick shoutout to JM for his comment on my last post re: veganism. I'll try to touch on that soon and continue the discussion about absolute changes vs. tinkering at the margins.)
-k